ScaleXpertz Logo
ScaleXpertz.
← All Case Studies

Research by ScaleXpertz

07

Multi-Category Catalogue

Meta Ads · Multi-Category Catalogue

“₹1.02 Cr spent. 251 campaigns. 12.54X average ROAS.”

eCommerce

12.54X at ₹1.02 Cr Spend. Built an ad engine that could absorb crore-level spend. Across 251 live campaigns the account recorded ₹1.02 Cr spend, 9,089 purchases and 12.54X average ROAS.

Multi-Category Catalogue — 12.54X at ₹1.02 Cr Spend

The Problem

At this scale, the challenge is not only finding one successful campaign. It is maintaining enough control to compare different campaign structures, keep a broad catalogue active and preserve efficiency as spend increases.

How We Solved It

ScaleXpertz ran CPA-capped, ABO and CBO structures side by side so the team could compare controls instead of relying on one setup. Strong ROAS appeared in more than one structure, while the 12.54X average covered the full 251-campaign set — not a single winning row.

What Made It Work

  • CPA-Capped Campaigns
  • ABO Catalogue
  • CBO Structures
  • Influencer Creative

Key Results

₹1.02 Cr

Total Ad Spend

12.54X

Average ROAS

9,089

Purchases

251

Live Campaigns

16.08X

All Products Campaign

Influencer creative

8M+

Link Clicks

₹1.05 average cost per click

Catalogue — Structure Comparison

All Products (influencer)16.08X
Account average12.54X
ABO catalogue12.12X
Narrow CBO10.59X
Narrow ABO9.13X

Reported ROAS

Named structure results vs. the 251-campaign account average

Scale without the collapse.

Spending at crore scale and watching efficiency slip? Let's put structures side by side.→

Prefer a copy? Download this case · Download the full report as PDF